<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="0.92"><channel><title>This was fun, doing this with you</title><link>http://stuartalanrook.blog.co.uk/</link><description></description><language>en-EU</language><docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss092</docs><item><title>In response to:Bananaman</title><description>Didnt bananaman have an enemy called apple man? He was well shit. I used to get the theme tune for that programme stuck in my head a lot.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Also, if I was in your seminar, I probably would have made the same joke. In all honesty, I reckon I'd have got the laughs too. </description><link>http://stuartalanrook.blog.co.uk/2006/01/18/bananaman~484788/#c684061</link><pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2006 15:27:48 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:Bananaman</title><description>true james, true, i have edited the post to reflect what i feel was where the humour of the situation arose, namely the mocking of the question 'was he called bananaman cos he ate bananas ?' and subsequent illustrations of just how fucking obvious it was that this was the case, including explorations of how ridiculous and shit it would be if it were not the case. &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
the fact that no-one could remember with 1000% certainty (i.e the 'for when eric eats a banana' line or mental images of him eating a banana') was neither here nor there and my original draft seems to have made too much of the fact we couldnt remember, leading to it reading like a plea for clarification on the matter or something. &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Great times. &lt;br&gt;
Ok, average times. </description><link>http://stuartalanrook.blog.co.uk/2006/01/18/bananaman~484788/#c586726</link><pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2006 16:34:16 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:Bananaman</title><description>Stu, stu, stu! What are you playing at mate?! The opening credits go:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
"For when Eric eats a banana, an amazing transformation occurs..."&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
How can you remember Bananaman and not remember that?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Anyway, I think that pretty much answers your question. That is unless the narrator had also been fooled by Eric into thinking that his powers were banana-related and, as you said, his magical powers in fact came from some other source (photosynthesis perhaps?) Who knows?!</description><link>http://stuartalanrook.blog.co.uk/2006/01/18/bananaman~484788/#c578398</link><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2006 17:05:02 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:Bananaman</title><description>banananananaman was a bummer i heard.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
he did more than just eat bananananas.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
dirty old fucker.</description><link>http://stuartalanrook.blog.co.uk/2006/01/18/bananaman~484788/#c576076</link><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2006 01:40:14 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:31st August</title><description>I wrote the stuff myself yes, if thats what you mean mr joker 325. </description><link>http://stuartalanrook.blog.co.uk/2005/08/31/31st_august~154156/#c576029</link><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2006 00:56:54 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:Who the fuck are you ?</title><description>you have mastered the who the f are you look!! Very funny!!</description><link>http://stuartalanrook.blog.co.uk/2005/12/16/tee_hee~390469/#c567303</link><pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2006 10:56:51 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:Who the fuck are you ?</title><description>Hahaha. Quality. I don't think there is ever a situation where 'the look' is inappropriate.</description><link>http://stuartalanrook.blog.co.uk/2005/12/16/tee_hee~390469/#c453506</link><pubDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2005 18:37:10 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:Who the fuck are you ?</title><description>Amazing post stu - very funny. I love the 'look' - I can relate cos I employ it whenever I can.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Great times, great times.</description><link>http://stuartalanrook.blog.co.uk/2005/12/16/tee_hee~390469/#c448944</link><pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2005 19:27:35 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:Keswick - The Home Of Greatness</title><description>thats it !&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Denzel Dexter !&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
You can't deny he looks like him though !&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
great times. </description><link>http://stuartalanrook.blog.co.uk/2005/09/24/title~198689/#c369892</link><pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2005 16:57:04 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:Keswick - The Home Of Greatness</title><description>The prof in the Fast Show was called Denzel Dexter</description><link>http://stuartalanrook.blog.co.uk/2005/09/24/title~198689/#c369772</link><pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2005 16:18:38 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:31st August</title><description>Your website looks great. Did you do it yourself?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href=""&gt;&lt;/a&gt; </description><link>http://stuartalanrook.blog.co.uk/2005/08/31/31st_august~154156/#c355721</link><pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2005 22:00:26 +0100</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:Pete is a T-Shirt Thief</title><description>Hello Stu. just popping by and saying hello. Im quite taken by the jumper of the chap next to Pete. Although quite plain, the luminous stylings of the sleeves up the ante a bit. Unless Richard Madely's been altering the colours.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Get your band going, me old son.</description><link>http://stuartalanrook.blog.co.uk/2005/09/25/pete_is_a_t_shirt_thief~200120/#c250483</link><pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2005 21:50:51 +0200</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:Pete is a T-Shirt Thief</title><description>Apparently Richard Madeley of Richard and Judy fame has some photoshop skills. He took all his family pictures and de-wrinkled Judy and then reprinted them and put them back. Judy was really pissed off and he couldn't figure out why.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
(according to popbitch)</description><link>http://stuartalanrook.blog.co.uk/2005/09/25/pete_is_a_t_shirt_thief~200120/#c221408</link><pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2005 14:01:28 +0200</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:Georgov and the mcmuffin meal.</title><description>Wow, what a flattering picture.  And not in any way sleazy looking....the lettuce was a nice touch I feel.</description><link>http://stuartalanrook.blog.co.uk/2005/09/01/title~156959/#c139140</link><pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2005 21:49:18 +0200</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:31st August</title><description>i thought the description of the number of geordies as 'disturbing' was quite amusing. it wasn't.</description><link>http://stuartalanrook.blog.co.uk/2005/08/31/31st_august~154156/#c125267</link><pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2005 20:21:48 +0200</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:title-154140</title><description>looking forward to the laughs!</description><link>http://stuartalanrook.blog.co.uk/2005/08/31/title~154140/#c124986</link><pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2005 18:08:31 +0200</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:31st August</title><description>Madskillz roadshow goin dooooown!</description><link>http://stuartalanrook.blog.co.uk/2005/08/31/31st_august~154156/#c124982</link><pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2005 18:05:03 +0200</pubDate></item><item><title>In response to:31st August</title><description>I thought you said "I'm only gonna post funny stuff up here" - what's this football bollocks about then? sort it out stu.</description><link>http://stuartalanrook.blog.co.uk/2005/08/31/31st_august~154156/#c124979</link><pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2005 18:02:20 +0200</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
